NotNowNigel

[Concrete/Little bit interesting] The Microsoft Prism framework provides a couple of very useful interfaces for managing awareness of view activation and navigation.       IActiveAware IActiveAware is a simple interface you can implement on your views to indicate that you want the view to be notified when it is made active or inactive. It looks like this: public interface IActiveAware { /// <summary> /// Gets or sets a value indicating whether the object is active. /// </summary> /// <value><see langword="true" /> if the object is active; otherwise <see langword="false" />.</value> bool IsActive { get; set; } /// <summary> /// Notifies that the value for <see cref="IsActive"/> property has changed. /// </summary> event EventHandler IsActiveChanged; } The IsActive flag lets you know if your view is active, and the IsActiveChange...

[Concrete/Interesting]   Here is a picture Like it?     Actually, this is a test for using Windows Live Writer to publish to SharePoint Wiki. Which sounds easy, but you guessed it, it’s not. I’ll let you know how I get on. Frankly, it’s all rather disappointing. I guess someone at Microsoft, looking to make SharePoint a little more useful thought “well it’s good at lists and HTML docs, if you add a template with an on-page editor, hey presto, you’ve got a Wiki”. Only, it’s not that simple and the editor is far too lightweight. Windows Live Write (WLW) on the other hand is a well thought out, powerful tool. Clearly the best Blog editor in my mind. It’s the reason I have a Windows VM on my Mac. So I gave it a go and WLW doesn’t want to talk to the Wiki because it’s not a blog, doesn’t support the APIs, just a list with an editor. However, it was suggested that I could author my pages against my SharePoint blog. Great. It worked brilliantly. WLW talks...

[Concrete/Interesting] A while back I saw a BBC Horizon programme about Fermat’s Last Theorem and the mathematically heroic work by Andrew Wiles in raising the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture from a mere conjecture to a theorem and using this to show a contradiction between the predictions of the epsilon conjecture and Wiles’ proof that all such elliptic curves must be modular. This contraction implies there are no solutions to Fermat’s equation, hence Fermat’s equation is true.   Like many, I was excited about this proof and although difficult to follow (Elliptic Curves are hard to understand, no kidding), the proof was without a doubt a clever piece of late 20th century mathematical wizardry, full of deep insight and imagination. But something was wrong. It was all to clever, all too complex, all to contemporary. So to mark the birth of my new baby boy, Khaliq, I decided to provide a simple proof, maybe not complete in mathematical rigor and probably nowhere near robust enough ...